3 ms·
The article and the website tell different info - TechCrunch says it's free up to 50 checks per year; the website - that it's free up to 25 checks. Then, it's $
by nikolay 10y ago
The article and the website tell different info - TechCrunch says it's free up to 50 checks per year; the website - that it's free up to 25 checks. Then, it's $1/check, I assume, as there's no info for pricing for individuals. $1/check is too much - both for business and individual use, but especially for businesses! Plus, I don't see how is this better than ACH as most probably it's using ACH underneath unlike, let's say, Dwolla.
- pjg 10y agoThe website has the most current info and it says explicitly 25Checks/Annually free for Individuals and after that $1/Check. Businesses pay $1/Check. Recipients of the Checks pay nothing, only the originator does. We use both ACH as well as Check21 (which is a different network than ACH) and this allows us to do overnight credits. ACH Debits take 2-3 working days whereas Check21 can be overnight. This avoids two problems with ACH i.e. account verification and 3 day delay in addition to some bank accounts not being ACH enabled.
- nikolay 10y agoSo, basically, after the article, you halved the number of free checks - great strategy. Not!
- zacharycollins 10y agoSo they're never able to update their pricing because they were featured on TC? Makes no sense.
- nikolay 10y agoTechCrunch published the article, I read it a few minutes later, visited the site, and the pricing was hiked 100% essentially. So lame! So immature! With this attitude, they will be out of business not so far from now!
- pjg 10y agoThe pricing on TC article is $1/Check for businesses and its the same on our site. For Individuals the feedback we got is most individuals are not writing more than 2-3 Checks per month and that's what it is on the website i.e. 25 Checks free annually.