3 ms·
Well, the 2K HR employees wont be sitting around in offices doing nothing, that's for sure. But still, the ratio is counter intuitive to me as the usual recomm
by DominikR 10y ago
Well, the 2K HR employees wont be sitting around in offices doing nothing, that's for sure.
But still, the ratio is counter intuitive to me as the usual recommendations look vastly different.
I'm curious to learn why Linkedins business model requires this amount of HR employees.
If somebody knows, please let me know!
- eitally 10y agoIt's not HR in the sense you think. LinkedIn makes the majority of their money selling recruiting tools. That requires scads of talent management experts.
- joncrocks 10y agoBut wouldn't that come under sales? Or maybe product development? If they were all recruitment experts, that would still be a rather high ratio of expertise to engineering.