4 ms·

Please could you explain to me, if Squirrel is "similar to Lua, but uses a C like syntax", why I wouldn't want to use C or Lua instead? Is this about Steam? If

Please could you explain to me, if Squirrel is "similar to Lua, but uses a C like syntax", why I wouldn't want to use C or Lua instead? Is this about Steam? If not, is this (even) faster than Lua? Is it easier or safer than C? Am I missing something? You better have something seriously good to offer if in your first breath you're pitching yourself alongside the very best of both interpreted and compiled languages.

Jtsummers 10y ago
You would use this in the same arena you'd use Lua, not where you'd use C. That is, you want something more flexible than compiled C for your particular application. Why you'd use it over Lua, I haven't figured out yet, but I don't use either so I have no basis for comparison.
- je42 10y ago
  Actually, there are arena's where C is replaced by Lua (with LuaJIT) see OpenResty / Nginx with Lua. Where the normally C plugins to nginx are implemented with lua.
technomancy 10y ago
From the wiki (http://wiki.squirrel-lang.org/default.aspx/SquirrelWiki/Lua%20Compared%20to%20Squirrel.html http://wiki.squirrel-lang.org/default.aspx/SquirrelWiki/Lua%...) it looks like most of the reasons Squirrel was created stemmed from problems that have since been fixed in Lua. The remaining differences seem pretty minor; IMO having the OO system baked into the language instead of implemented in user-space is a step backwards. The 0-indexing might be nice if you do a lot of FFI with C, I suppose. Hardly worth giving up the insane performance of LuaJIT for though.