> Please correct me if I am wrong, but for any large project, Haskell actually adds more woes (e.g. laziness induced problems, no good debugging support) than t

> Please correct me if I am wrong, but for any large project, Haskell actually adds more woes (e.g. laziness induced problems, no good debugging support) than the ones it addresses. If you want to make a blanket assertion like that, then the onus is on you to provide some evidence of it. The fact that a strict dialect of Haskell exists somewhere in the world and is being used for application X is interesting, but it does not support your claim about Haskell's viability as a general-purpose language.