From some of these comments it makes me feel like a lot of people didn't actually read the article. 1. Yes the pokemon reference is stupid but its more about

From some of these comments it makes me feel like a lot of people didn't actually read the article. 1. Yes the pokemon reference is stupid but its more about how technology companies located in major hubs are making money from everywhere and not giving back. Examples used: Hollywood was always major entertainment but created jobs through local theatres. Detroit was major area for cars but created jobs through dealerships. 2. His solutions are horrible and his clear linkbait to shoehorn pokemon into this article shows that this article was written to elicit these types of reactions.