5 ms·

All of this was laid out in the Brexit arguments. We all watched it on TV and read about it. Leave said they would continue to fund science, farms, Wales and Co

All of this was laid out in the Brexit arguments. We all watched it on TV and read about it. Leave said they would continue to fund science, farms, Wales and Cornwall and match the EU funding. Weather this actually happens will be interesting. I think the Tories will neg on that. I think Labour would keep funding. But in Cornwall, all those millions of EU funding were spent on total crap and none of the local people saw much (if any) of the investment. Most of it went to big business or to stupid stuff.

DanBC 10y ago
> Leave said they would continue to fund science, farms, Wales and Cornwall and match the EU funding. How can they fund all that stuff when they said they would spend all that money on the NHS? http://imgur.com/indvx6a http://imgur.com/indvx6a "Let's give our NHS the £350 million the EU takes every week" - that's not "some of" or "part of", that's "all of".
- monk_e_boy 10y ago
  The leave campaign was made up of a lot of random people who all had different ideas. You pick one who has an idea that you agree with and vote for that person. Not everyone in the leave campaign agreed with "Let's give our NHS the £350 million the EU takes every week" .... the people who DID don't want to fund science with that money. I assume that have another idea for where that money will come from.
  - AnonymousPlanet 10y ago
    Ah, so a lot of random people all make different promises and every voter believes in their favourite pick. For every broken promise you just have to point at the "random people" and say 'Booya, that promise doesn't count" even if all promises get broken. Neat trick.
    - monk_e_boy 10y ago
      The stay argument was 'more of the same' and millions of us can't live with more of the same. I need money for food. For shelter. For clothes. There are a lot of us really far down on the maslow's hierarchy of needs. We need change, even if that change is chaotic.
      - AnonymousPlanet 10y ago
        Seriously? That is your reasoning here?" Let's change something and I keep reading these scathing headlines about foreign bureaucrats and foreigners having jobs here, so let's get rid of them." One giant ill prepared and not really thought out knee jerk. That's one of the most stupid decisions I've ever seen.
        monk_e_boy 10y ago
        says the rich man sigh
  - DanBC 10y ago
    That promise is from the "official" leave campaign, and was promoted heavily by that campaign.
- BellsOnSunday 10y ago
  It wasn't a general election and I didn't vote for either of the sides. If "Leave" (as if that were one organisation) said "it" was going to do something, how could that be guaranteed, unless they were able to form a government? If you believed them then it must be disappointing but welcome to UK politics. I gave my answer to the question on the ballot slip, something I had a settled view on before the campaign began and I don't think I'm that unusual. I think that claims about the £350m etc made as much difference as claims that brexit would bring on the apocalypse by lunchtime.
king_phil 10y ago
A lot of the UK government's money is spent on stupid stuff, too. And big businesses. Badum tzzz...

DanBC 10y ago

> Leave said they would continue to fund science, farms, Wales and Cornwall and match the EU funding. How can they fund all that stuff when they said they would spend all that money on the NHS? http://imgur.com/indvx6a http://imgur.com/indvx6a "Let's give our NHS the £350 million the EU takes every week" - that's not "some of" or "part of", that's "all of".

monk_e_boy 10y ago
The leave campaign was made up of a lot of random people who all had different ideas. You pick one who has an idea that you agree with and vote for that person. Not everyone in the leave campaign agreed with "Let's give our NHS the £350 million the EU takes every week" .... the people who DID don't want to fund science with that money. I assume that have another idea for where that money will come from.
- AnonymousPlanet 10y ago
  Ah, so a lot of random people all make different promises and every voter believes in their favourite pick. For every broken promise you just have to point at the "random people" and say 'Booya, that promise doesn't count" even if all promises get broken. Neat trick.
  - monk_e_boy 10y ago
    The stay argument was 'more of the same' and millions of us can't live with more of the same. I need money for food. For shelter. For clothes. There are a lot of us really far down on the maslow's hierarchy of needs. We need change, even if that change is chaotic.
    - AnonymousPlanet 10y ago
      Seriously? That is your reasoning here?" Let's change something and I keep reading these scathing headlines about foreign bureaucrats and foreigners having jobs here, so let's get rid of them." One giant ill prepared and not really thought out knee jerk. That's one of the most stupid decisions I've ever seen.
      - monk_e_boy 10y ago
        says the rich man sigh
- DanBC 10y ago
  That promise is from the "official" leave campaign, and was promoted heavily by that campaign.
BellsOnSunday 10y ago
It wasn't a general election and I didn't vote for either of the sides. If "Leave" (as if that were one organisation) said "it" was going to do something, how could that be guaranteed, unless they were able to form a government? If you believed them then it must be disappointing but welcome to UK politics. I gave my answer to the question on the ballot slip, something I had a settled view on before the campaign began and I don't think I'm that unusual. I think that claims about the £350m etc made as much difference as claims that brexit would bring on the apocalypse by lunchtime.

king_phil 10y ago

A lot of the UK government's money is spent on stupid stuff, too. And big businesses. Badum tzzz...