3 ms·
> so that you don't make this embarrassing error again. I really don't think that condescending tone was needed, regardless of parent's knowledge of the subje
by teh_klev 10y ago
> so that you don't make this embarrassing error again.
I really don't think that condescending tone was needed, regardless of parent's knowledge of the subject matter at hand, we're above that here.
- frabbit 10y agoWhen the OP's assertion was that Irish identity is: 1) nothing more than being opposition 2) inherently racist (focussed on being anti another ethnicity) then I will take your rebuke and downvote as evidence of either a lack of thought or a deliberate attempt to insult. Stick to Scotland friend. You may actually know something about it.
- Chris2048 10y ago> inherently racist You're just throwing around that accusation to justify bad behavior. It's easy to attach any label when you have such loose definitions ("anti" "ethnicity"). > nothing more than being opposition You added "nothing more", which plays the same role as the "just" in "just a theory" - turning a statement in context into a straw-man. > then I will take your rebuke and downvote as evidence of either a lack of thought or a deliberate attempt to insult Isn't that convenient. I take the lack of content in your post as evidence of the same. > Stick to Scotland friend. You may actually know something about it. Sticking with the condescension, eh? If you know something about this topic, why not show us?