3 ms·
While I understand the sentiment and frustration, a few corrections and comments: 1. This is not radical new law, but has been in place for a year; it's only n
by csydas 10y ago
While I understand the sentiment and frustration, a few corrections and comments:
1. This is not radical new law, but has been in place for a year; it's only now that Roskomnadzor has elected to address this particular VPN service. This doesn't change the shock of server seizure, but it also has been clear that this was a long time coming, or should have been for the VPN provider.
2. In regards to the comment on the US, I'm sure they'll pay attention, but not in the way you're thinking. Remember, even though the US has no blanket policy for ISPs and other service providers, they do frequently issue warrants for the data already stored by ISPs and service providers. [1,2,3] Compliance for these usually isn't an option, nor do many businesses have the resources to fight the government successfully.
3. Even before government snoop acts and projects, ISPs and companies based in the US (and outside) have been willingly handing over customer data as a matter of business.
Government snooping likely won't "kill tech", rather, it will kill very specific privacy oriented tech. This is indeed bad, and I am not sure how to ensure that my plainness of statement does not understate the severity, but provisions such as what Russia and the EU have will not be the deathknell for technology in the United States, or even across the globe, any more than what the US has already done with it's snooping and spying.
In short, if tech can still pull money after the NSA revelations, it's likely able to survive more foreign regulations.
[1] https://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Privacy:_Stored_Communications_Act https://ilt.eff.org/index.php/Privacy:_Stored_Communications...
[2] http://digitaldueprocess.org/index.cfm?objectid=37940370-2551-11DF-8E02000C296BA163 http://digitaldueprocess.org/index.cfm?objectid=37940370-255...
[3] http://www.cnet.com/news/house-panel-approves-broadened-isp-snooping-bill/ http://www.cnet.com/news/house-panel-approves-broadened-isp-...
- simbalion 10y agoI think we should also remember that Putin is believed to be a mass murderer, and there is no reason to think that Russia can get better with regards to ethical standards with Putin in charge.
- csydas 10y agoI didn't suggest any such thing, nor am I excusing Russia's actions in the least bit. The original comment seemed to think that the US wasn't already involved in this type of snooping and aggressive actions towards people's privacy, and that such actions would be a poison to tech - if anything, tech and government have happily crawled into bed with one another in the US, with only a few important cases where there has been resistance. So I responded to point out that the US has very little to learn from Russia - if the lesson is supposed to be trampling privacy and freedom via technology is going to hamper tech-businesses, then I really don't think the US learned it during any of the times it did exactly that. I don't think it learned it when the EU did it, and I don't think they're going to learn it from a VPN provider's servers being seized in Russia. The US heard the lesson long ago, and just didn't care. Putin having skeletons in his closet doesn't really change any of that.