3 ms·
I'd think a news gathering operation would have their own recordings to check and verify. I don't see a quote from the attorney in support of the claim that th
by jsprogrammer 10y ago
I'd think a news gathering operation would have their own recordings to check and verify.
I don't see a quote from the attorney in support of the claim that the stop was called in.
If the call was already broadcast, I don't see why it couldn't be confirmed. Is this source the only one recording?
- wl 10y agoI linked to that additional article as confirmation that the shooter thought that Castile looked like a robbery suspect. While the article doesn't have any direct quotes to that effect, it paraphrases him saying as much. The claim that the shooter called in the stop before he made it is unremarkable because that's standard practice. In fact, it'd be more unusual if he hadn't called it in. Doubly so when stopping a suspected armed robber. A big reason why officers call in every stop is so that if the stop goes sideways and they are never heard from again, at least dispatch got the plate so investigators know where to begin. I'd wager most news operations use Radio Reference these days rather than worry running all that gear and archiving all that audio themselves. Some of the relevant streams were down that night[1], probably explaining why there aren't other copies floating around. [1] http://forums.radioreference.com/broadcastify-live-audio-listener-support/336321-missing-audio-archives.html http://forums.radioreference.com/broadcastify-live-audio-lis...
- jsprogrammer 10y agoI'd wager you can setup a scanner and more than a year of storage for <$100. The total volume of the setup would be a very small cube that would just need to be attached to an antenna. There is really no excuse not to be doing it at this point. Especially when third parties are proven unreliable.