I don't think this is correct. Each day when we drive we assume a certain degree of risk and implicitly acknowledge that we may be hurt. We make the decision t

I don't think this is correct. Each day when we drive we assume a certain degree of risk and implicitly acknowledge that we may be hurt. We make the decision to put ourselves in danger, whereas in the trolley problem we are led to assume that all parties are not responsible for their present situation. This distinction may be very important: if all parties in the trolley problem had entered into a covenant acknowledging that they may be killed, would more people opt to kill the one and save the five?