4 ms·
Just 16 cores short of having one per chessboard square, like the pioneering parallel chess machine Hitech... https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/HiTech?f=
by jbellis 17y ago
Just 16 cores short of having one per chessboard square, like the pioneering parallel chess machine Hitech...
https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/HiTech?f=print https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/HiTech?f=print
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.8874&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126...
- dmaz 17y agoI'm glad this has been done :) I thought of the same thing when I first heard of Tilera's TILE64.
- lsb 17y agoAs Minsky has said, parallelism isn't worth a damn thing if you don't have better heuristics to prune the search space. If you have a million processors to play chess with, and your search tree still has a branching factor of thirty, you're only looking two moves ahead. The human mind is amazing because our pattern-matching-based search heuristics are great.
- xiaoma 17y agoOur pattern-matching-based search heuristics are great because the human mind is amazing. At least that's how I see it ;)