4 ms·
A less cynical interpretation would be that Dan expected the $70k to attract top people and inspire a great deal of loyalty and that the publicity from announci
by noonespecial 10y ago
A less cynical interpretation would be that Dan expected the $70k to attract top people and inspire a great deal of loyalty and that the publicity from announcing this radical approach would more than make up for the extra cost in new business. In other words, cheap advertising.
Oh and Dan has 60% ownership so he makes that call and every other. Sounds open and shut to me.
- wutbrodo 10y ago> Oh and Dan has 60% ownership so he makes that call and every other. Sounds open and shut to me. Umm....I'm a little shocked you're not aware of this but 60% ownership doesn't give you the right to use the corporate credit card for personal expenses (which is what the suit is about[1]). How on earth is that open-and-shut just because he has 60% ownership? [1]From the article: "On Friday, Judge Theresa B. Doyle of Superior Court in King County, in Washington State, ruled that Dan’s brother, Lucas, had failed to prove his claims that Dan had overpaid himself and inappropriately used a corporate credit card for personal expenses."