I consider this advice to be evil. Are people looking to show that Toyota actually caused these accidents, or are they looking to pick apart potential flaws in

I consider this advice to be evil. Are people looking to show that Toyota actually caused these accidents, or are they looking to pick apart potential flaws in testing processes and use those to imply that Toyota did something wrong? Truth, or smear for cash? Simply put, this sounds like someone with an axe to grind who is more than happy to "stick it" to Toyota if it gets their point across.