42 ms·
I had some of the same questions...my suspicion is basically two fold 1) the infill change may have been intended to make the print times comparable (he sugges
by avs733 10y ago
I had some of the same questions...my suspicion is basically two fold
1) the infill change may have been intended to make the print times comparable (he suggested both were about 18 hrs)
2) He may have been attempting to compare the default (or default-ish) settings of each machine
- MikeAPD 10y agoHi, I wrote this article. To answer your suspicions. 1) Realistically they are within an hour of each other regardless of infill so the total print time was negligible in this experiment. A few changes on both machines could make either or print much faster. 2) Yes, it was my intention to have the same layer heights and overall print settings as close to each other as I could.
- avs733 10y agoThanks for the information