4 ms·

I'm kind of on the fence here. I played Ingress quite a bit (and early), but what I disliked was that it seemed multiplayer only. There was very little (for me)

I'm kind of on the fence here. I played Ingress quite a bit (and early), but what I disliked was that it seemed multiplayer only. There was very little (for me) return for being a solo player and most Ingress communication at that time happened in G+ (aka I wasn't part of that). Pokemon Go is in some ways a limited Ingress, but the collecting/evolving/upgrading part of the game is what got to me. I'd be glad about social features in the game. But I already think that this is a better game than Ingress for me personally.

yoodenvranx 10y ago
If I am on my own then Pomemon Go is currently much more exciting than Ingress. But I miss i) you can not annoy opponents by blowing up their farms/homeportals, ii) make long bike tours in order to build large fields and iii) meeting with 8+ players and building a nice L8 farm, iv) being involved in continent-wide fielding operations with 100s of other players. tldr: Pokemon Go is the better single player game, but if you are into large-scale and coordinated multi player games then Ingress is better.