How so? He claimed the name in the name of security, it seems just reasonable to make sure it will still be used for security relevant purposes. Not sure if yo

How so? He claimed the name in the name of security, it seems just reasonable to make sure it will still be used for security relevant purposes. Not sure if you are familiar with ruby, but a lot of libraries include "OpenSSL" and refer to the internal library, if there would be a public one with the same name this could have disastrous complications.