4 ms·
The point is more that there is no need for a breakthrough, because there is no need to postulate a mechanism for actual collapse, since decoherence is sufficie
by akvadrako 10y ago
The point is more that there is no need for a breakthrough, because there is no need to postulate a mechanism for actual collapse, since decoherence is sufficient to explain the results of experiments.
I'm not sure what your argument is, but nobody is proving a multiverse, it's just an observation.