4 ms·
> If you were to stop all of those things, you could surely stop the rain as well. By the way, this is not true in general. Suppose B…F are sampled from Boole
by mistersheik 10y ago
> If you were to stop all of those things, you could surely stop the rain as well.
By the way, this is not true in general. Suppose B…F are sampled from Boolean variables with bias 0.5. A Boolean circuit like A = (sum(B,C,D,E,F)>3) + (not B and not C and… not F). A is correlated with all of its causes B through F. However, stopping all of its causes, causes A to turn on.
> If you were to stop all of those things, you could surely stop the rain as well.
But, you typically can't intervene everywhere. For example, you may not have any power over the gardener who normally turns the sprinkler on. The point of interventions (like turning a sprinkler on) is that you can reason about what would happen.
- Retra 10y ago"B...F" are not all the causes of A. You forgot to include the relation "f(B...F)", whose existence is also strongly correlated with A, as per the entire justification for using that '=' symbol the way you have.