3 ms·
So someone doesn't like surge pricing and decides to wield the heaviest stick they can (the State) against Uber, via antitrust (legislation which shouldn't exis
by duncan_bayne 10y ago
So someone doesn't like surge pricing and decides to wield the heaviest stick they can (the State) against Uber, via antitrust (legislation which shouldn't exist in a free country).
Then he has the gall to complain that the company he's trying to sue investigates him in an aggressive and possibly illegal manner.
I don't see there's a good guy here. AFAICT, both he and Uber are behaving in a fairly contemptible fashion.
For those here who support antitrust legislation (even in cases other than this one), this is worthwhile reading:
https://mises.org/library/antitrust-case-repeal https://mises.org/library/antitrust-case-repeal
"Professor Armentano begins with the most rigorous and revealing account of the Microsoft antitrust battle to appear in print. He further discusses other recent cases, including Toys `R' Us, Staples, and Intel, as well as many historical cases. He covers nearly every conceivable rationale for antitrust, including price fixing, tie ins, vertical and horizontal mergers, and many more."
It's a bit old, but still highly relevant.