3 ms·
> Tesla has now reviewed the logs and says that there’s “no data to suggest that Autopilot was engaged at the time of the incident." is a quoted directly from
by aschobel 10y ago
> Tesla has now reviewed the logs and says that there’s “no data to suggest that Autopilot was engaged at the time of the incident."
is a quoted directly from the article. It is also the title of the story.
- tristanj 10y agoQuoted from the part of the article the author crossed out and rewrote because it's inaccurate. And the title is a quote taken out of context.
- aschobel 10y agoI had not seen that edit. Agreed that the title is inaccurate. The trend on these Telsa / EV blogs has been to take Tesla's logs as gospel and discount human observation. There have been other reports of users claiming autopilot being engaged when it was not and reports of not noticing that summon was enabled even though one can't really miss that (that has subsequently been redesigned). Human factors for these systems is incredibly challenging since such a wide audience of users useses them.
- tristanj 10y agoFor the record, the crossed out and updated section was added two days before you posted your comment. At that time, the author added a link right at the top to a newer, more accurate article. The author also added the word "[Updated]" to the title so people would notice this change.