3 ms·
You might work at the institutional level where they want to do this frequently, but I don't think most players would trade directly with each other. One of th
by secretasiandan 17y ago
You might work at the institutional level where they want to do this frequently, but I don't think most players would trade directly with each other. One of the purposes of exchanges is to reduce counterparty risk. So only those firms that have the resources to fully vet each other would do this. Not all firms will do this because then you have to vet everyone you trade with which is time consuming.
The many reasons why institutions don't often trade directly with each other, including the anonymity, are covered in the book "Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners"
- ig1 17y agoSure but in most markets I'm guessing the majority of flow is between institutions who already have credit lines with each other (or alternatively use clearing houses like CLS or the DTCC). There are already equity dark pools which operate on the basis that everyone has credit lines with everyone else rather than taking on the counterparty risk/margin management themselves.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]