4 ms·
Yeah, but whither faster? When I was an imperfect programmer ( perfect to some epsilon TBD ) I wanted to be a more perfect programmer. This was not without cost
by ArkyBeagle 10y ago
Yeah, but whither faster? When I was an imperfect programmer ( perfect to some epsilon TBD ) I wanted to be a more perfect programmer. This was not without cost.
I suppose if you're not interested in that ( and I understand that impulse, believe me ) then ...
I have to, by training, attribute all defects to process and human behavior. But as things emerge, maybe the tools will really fill the gap. But again, at a cost.
I am, say, pretty good with Python but I am by no means a master. It would take having a full time exposure for months, perhaps years to make that claim. And this fragments us. It may well be that I'd actually be better fit for a job using Python but because I can't make this claim now, we get a false negative on fitness.
I'm just using "me" and "Python" to construct an example.