4 ms·
> See, for instance, the following from someone with no connection to FP Complete that I'm aware of You may be interested to know that Carter (the guy you're q
by hvr_ 10y ago
> See, for instance, the following from someone with no connection to FP Complete that I'm aware of
You may be interested to know that Carter (the guy you're quoting) knows better today, and has even become a Hackage Trustee whose mission is more or less to uphold those very PVP upper bounds ;-)
- dllthomas 10y agoAmusing, but orthogonal to my point, which was that the move away from parts of the PVP was motivated by real concerns, and moreover that the comment above was specifically an obvious reference to concerns that had been voiced during that time. I am not arguing that the move away from the PVP was correct - I was uncertain at the time and I remain uncertain.
- mightybyte 10y agoThe concerns you're talking about here were primarily deficiencies in tooling, not an inherent problem with the PVP. Many of those deficiencies have been fixed (for example, --allow-newer) or there is work in progress that will fix them (cabal new-build, cabal.project files, etc).
- dllthomas 10y agoThat may very well be the case. Again, I'm not arguing about the PVP. I'm arguing that discussion of those concerns is not non sequitur.