3 ms·
a cursory google search shows that apparently qlink has been reverse engineered ( http://orrtech.us/qlink/index.html http://orrtech.us/qlink/index.html ). I won
by visualphoenix 10y ago
a cursory google search shows that apparently qlink has been reverse engineered ( http://orrtech.us/qlink/index.html http://orrtech.us/qlink/index.html ). I wonder if this would help them...
- visualphoenix 10y agofurther google-fu shows https://github.com/ssalevan/qlink https://github.com/ssalevan/qlink and https://github.com/jasmaz/qlink https://github.com/jasmaz/qlink but it looks like http://www.lyonlabs.org/commodore/qlink/ http://www.lyonlabs.org/commodore/qlink/ they really do need the original qlink software to continue the work
- VonGuard 10y agoWe use QLink Reloaded, and Jasmaz is in our IRC channel to help. The issue is that QLink uses a really byzantine system of communication with the server, where it's constantly going"57, 26, 23" and each of those numbers means a very distinct function. No one has a clue what those numbers mean, so QLink Reloaded is basically only the bits that could be reverse engineered in this black box situation. We have modified QLink Reloaded for our purposes, though.