3 ms·
You would think. I took a course at Caltech named Philosophy of Science, and we spent weeks discussing what a "law of nature" is. I think the article title is
by shard 17y ago
You would think.
I took a course at Caltech named Philosophy of Science, and we spent weeks discussing what a "law of nature" is.
I think the article title is incorrect though. The law wasn't broken (that'd make sense if it was a legal system law), the law had been disproved, perhaps.
- ahk 17y agoBroken could also be correct if it was a "law" currently in effect universally and only the high energy of the event lead to its violation i.e the physicists using high energies managed to circumvent something that usually holds true.