4 ms·This is from 2005, and should be marked as such.by onewland 17y agoThis is from 2005, and should be marked as such.philwelch 17y agoDoes it really matter? I changed it, but this is pretty obviously not a "current events" story.onewland 17y agoI had read it before, and with the year I would not have re-read it.BigO 17y agoso you re-read the article then realised you had read it before?onewland 17y agoI re-read part of it before I recognized it as the shitty article it was. It was fluff in 2005, it's fluff in 2010.