3 ms·
> Second comes the fact that you can't sort arbitrary types anymore Surely that's a bug in the system that you've just uncovered and fixed? Py2 used to use th
by orf 10y ago
> Second comes the fact that you can't sort arbitrary types anymore
Surely that's a bug in the system that you've just uncovered and fixed? Py2 used to use the memory address of the object when comparing by default, which is just... crazy, especially for a language with so few WTFs:
>>> object() > object()
True
>>> object() > object()
False
>>> object() > object()
True
>>> object() > object()
False
> In order to ease porting, I've created a modified Python 3.6 interpreter
That looks amazing! We're going to end up porting a fairly large + critical Django app to py3 and I definitely think this could ease some of the pain. I'm going to give it a go when I get the chance.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> Py2 used to use the memory address of the object when comparing by default, which is just... crazy, Its true that that's crazy, but, OTOH, everything-can-be-sorted is a useful feature (which Erlang has, for instance). Py3 could conceptually have retained it with a different implementation (this would probably still have been a breaking change from Py2, but not a feature loss.)