3 ms·

By "some stupid thing to their headers" are you referring to nullability annotations? I'm not sure what else Apple would have added to pure C headers (as oppose

• solidsnack9000 10y ago
  I would like to know, too.
  • neat159 10y ago
    Me too!
• tinco 10y ago
  I wanted my compiler to be able to compile a hello world. Something which would be trivial in any language, though of course not C. In C the first line of hello world is "#include<stdio.h>". No doubt known to you, that file is a veritable quagmire of incomprehensible C constructions, specific to each operating system. So I spent a few too many nights getting my compiler to get any possible C declaration known to mankind into its symboltables, just so I could get it to the code generator phase and emit all of three or so instructions. I forgot what the change was, and I can't find the commit that fixed it, as it seems active development on the library has resumed.
• axman6 10y ago
  It was possibly even a Apple added their blocks extension to C and Obj-C, I remember this verifying some issues for Haskell tool which parsed C.
  • eridius 10y ago
    That was many years ago. I was assuming tinco was referring to something more recent. Besides, AFAIK, every usage of blocks in Apple's headers is guarded by an #if check to make sure blocks are supported, so compilers that don't support blocks won't even see them.
• duaneb 10y ago
  Blocks, maybe? Not standardized but it's cross platform and compiler.