3 ms·
I would like to see some evidence on either side of this argument. I can see that there is logic to both cases. Saying one side is "simply not true" doesn't ma
by SimonPStevens 10y ago
I would like to see some evidence on either side of this argument.
I can see that there is logic to both cases. Saying one side is "simply not true" doesn't make your case. Is there any firm evidence either way.
- adamnemecek 10y agoRead the comments in this thread. The current crisis is generally attributed to the 2008 lifting of CITES restrictions that has allowed African countries to sell their stockpiles to China and Japan.
- soyiuz 10y agoSome of the most convincing evidence comes from American prohibition of alcohol and the drug wars. Basic economic principles dictate that the supply will expand to meet demand. As the demand is difficult to modulate, the strategy of regulating supply has been historically more effective. The prohibition created a robust black market which all but disappeared when alcohol production came back into the light by legal means. The same logic should hold true for ivory through farming or artificial production (see several comments to this point above).