3 ms·
The article mostly describes how elephants populations have been dwindling with the ban in place. I do not see any statistics supporting the view that elephant
by mbroshi 10y ago
The article mostly describes how elephants populations have been dwindling with the ban in place. I do not see any statistics supporting the view that elephant populations will dwindle any more quickly/slowly without a ban.
- pmontra 10y agoThere have been periods with and without bans. Elephant population decreased faster when there were no bans. http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/opinion/controversial-call-for-unrestricted-commercial-exports-2043369 http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/opinion/controversial-call-fo... "About half the continental population was lost in the decade before the Appendix I listing in 1989, and a dramatic spike occurred again after a “one-off” ivory sale in 2008 to China and Japan." "Cites [Appendix I] saved African elephants from certain extinction 27 years ago by listing them on Appendix I. It ended the poaching crisis and elephant populations began to recover, until their protection under Cites was weakened, causing poaching to escalate again."
- jbmorgado 10y agoThat piece fails to address that the reason is that the Western nations stopped financing so much the anti poaching enforcement in african countries. It was not exactly the lift of the ban, it was that Western nations decided that the problem was controlled, or that it was time that African nation started taking care of the poaching problem themselves and cut funding.