3 ms·
You underestimate the magic of machine learning! :0...kidding. Sort of. I suspect they thought there was a software solution to this problem (and for all I know
by gmarx 10y ago
You underestimate the magic of machine learning! :0...kidding. Sort of. I suspect they thought there was a software solution to this problem (and for all I know there might be)
- bllguo 10y agoWhat? Please elaborate! I can't think of how software overcomes this problem.
- gmarx 10y agoI doubt it can but if you did a large number of blood tests with finger stick and a large number at the same time with a regular blood draw you could put that data into some machine learning and see if you could figure out an algorithm to correct the results. You'd probably need more data than just the final counts. Maybe some kind of imaging data? Maybe ions? It's tough to speculate. Machine learning learning is all about finding patterns. Maybe some pattern could be used to do the correction?