4 ms·
Also: 4) migrate to other languages, such as Go ... which is not uncommon, and in many cases a pretty good idea.
by zeroxfe 10y ago
Also:
4) migrate to other languages, such as Go
... which is not uncommon, and in many cases a pretty good idea.
- ubernostrum 10y agomigrate to other languages, such as Go This depends heavily on the type of work someone is doing. People doing numeric/scientific computing work with Python can't really do this, for example, because there's a distinct lack of other languages with equivalents to the libraries and tooling Python gives them for their work. And that's a chicken/egg feedback loop problem: Go needs the libraries and tools, but in order get them needs people to move, but in order to get people to move needs the libraries/tools, and so on.
- tanlermin 10y agoJulia will be a suitable (superior) alternative soon.
- ubernostrum 10y agoRemember that the other thing about Python is that it's got good support for other types of programming -- for example, I work at a company which settled on Python (in part) because it allows a single language end-to-end. Our data ingestion, analytics/processing/number crunching, and end-user applications based on the data can all be built in Python, and even if you're not a domain expert in one of those areas you can at least read code to see what's going on and not be totally lost.
- tanlermin 10y agoJulia can do all that. its also a general programming language
- nameless912 10y agoWell sure, in the same way MATLAB is a general programming language. It can be done, but it'll make you feel icky.
- rspeer 10y agoIt's like you're recommending a restaurant by saying that its food is "edible". All in all, this is a bad recommendation. Julia is version 0.4. Its syntax changes with every version. It is not going to be stable soon. It is so far from stable that it doesn't have a plan for what stability will look like. It's fine if you want to get in on the ground floor of a programming language, or to learn a new language for the fun of it, but it's completely unreasonable to suggest that you could replace a programming language that people use for their jobs that way.
- keypusher 10y agoI've seen people saying this for years, yet I don't know anyone that has actually switched over. The people I do who have tried came right back to Python, often within a few days or weeks.
- tanlermin 10y agocareful continuing that linear extrapolation...I think it's about to hit a tipping point due to packages and tooling being much better.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- rspeer 10y agoAnd if you don't have time to switch from Python 2 to 3, you definitely don't have time to switch to Go.