> [they] do not test the same thing, they are not the same,and do not at all display the same riguor Ok, but I'm not sure who you're arguing with here. Is you

> [they] do not test the same thing, they are not the same,and do not at all display the same riguor Ok, but I'm not sure who you're arguing with here. Is your beef with the word "experiment"? Nobody is submitting these results to a journal. If you prefer, call it a demonstration re-enacting a phenomenon that has been the subject of other experiments.