3 ms·
The fundamental argument Comey puts forth is that no one else has ever been indicted for comparable behaviour. So it would be unreasonable to do so now. Given
by zzalpha 10y ago
The fundamental argument Comey puts forth is that no one else has ever been indicted for comparable behaviour. So it would be unreasonable to do so now.
Given that, it'd be far stranger if they did recommend prosecution, and in doing so broke from precedent.