3 ms·

I agree with this, but can someone really be held liable for something like this? I assume the painting did not come with a contract that states the artist/sell

by CoryG89 10y ago

I agree with this, but can someone really be held liable for something like this? I assume the painting did not come with a contract that states the artist/seller must always claim the work, from now to forever?

icebraining 10y ago
Not claiming his work is different from actively denying having made it. You don't need a contract to be sued for causing damages by knowingly making false claims. Assuming he's actually the author, he's in a way "defaming the painting".
- bitJericho 10y ago
  spreading damaging lies is most definitely something you can be sued for!