11 ms·
As much as I want to agree with you, I have to challenge you on this -- what makes you say this? I have a physics Ph.D. friend who is quite brilliant himself,
by whacked_new 19y ago
As much as I want to agree with you, I have to challenge you on this -- what makes you say this?
I have a physics Ph.D. friend who is quite brilliant himself, and when I asked him about Einstein he said something like Einstein had a particularly good, intuitive grasp of physics principles in a way most people weren't capable of. Actually I don't remember if this was Feynman or Einstein; I was asking him about the two, and basically he said that each of these people had some uncanny ability.
Daniel Tamment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Tammet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Tammet
isn't insanely intelligent but due to a different brain structure, has a supernormal memory, which makes him appear abnormally intelligent and creative. When he talks about shapes of numbers you can say he is particularly creative, but I find it impossible to dispute that this comes as a result of a brain anomaly he was born with.
- DaniFong 19y agoBoth Feynman and Einstein had a terrific physical intuition, but Feynman had more of an appearance of one since he was quite a showman, whereas for Einstein it was essentially his core asset. Feynman also had incredible facility with calculation: he was one of the first Putnam fellows. He left the exam early!
- whacked_new 19y agoAs much as I admire Feynman, the stories about his magician qualities are, honestly, so far beyond most people and end up being more entertaining than inspiring.