3 ms·
Not sure if this is exposing an absurdity in the law, or in the art trade. Maybe both. All of this stinks of a publicity stunt to inflate the painting's value
by andrewclunn 10y ago
Not sure if this is exposing an absurdity in the law, or in the art trade. Maybe both. All of this stinks of a publicity stunt to inflate the painting's value either way.
- dennisgorelik 10y agoThe whole story could have been designed to inflate the value of all Peter Doig's paintings. From that PR perspective it might make sense to actually pay $5M in damages in order to attract even more attention and sell the paintings on that hype.