3 ms·
If it's not supposed to be interesting, why do so many that have found themselves running up against the limits of GC in their chosen language/platform/implemen
by topspin 10y ago
If it's not supposed to be interesting, why do so many that have found themselves running up against the limits of GC in their chosen language/platform/implementation end up writing epic blog posts that represent months or years of work and/or presenting their hard one solutions at conferences? There certainly seems to be a lot of people that end up having to be very interested in solving their GC problems once their systems grow to non-trivial size, and they all seem to be relearning and resolving the same set of problems.
- coldtea 10y ago>If it's not supposed to be interesting, why do so many that have found themselves running up against the limits of GC in their chosen language/platform/implementation end up writing epic blog posts that represent months or years of work and/or presenting their hard one solutions at conferences? Because they care about improving actual, existing, languages, with actual, existing, ecosystems, not doing cutting edge academic memory management research. >and they all seem to be relearning and resolving the same set of problems. So like architects relearn and resolve the same problems, about building bridges, skyscrapers, condos etc -- instead of designing some new structures to replace them?