3 ms·
>"Craig : [Laughter]" I commented on the last article "Employee 1: Yahoo" [0] regarding interjection of "Hahaha" by the interviewer. Seems it was changed to [L
by a_small_island 10y ago
>"Craig : [Laughter]"
I commented on the last article "Employee 1: Yahoo" [0] regarding interjection of "Hahaha" by the interviewer. Seems it was changed to [Laughter], which seems much more inline and professional.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12009360 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12009360
- craigcannon 10y agoThanks for the feedback. :)
- richforrester 10y agoI missed the "hahaha", but came into this comment section to see if anyone else thought the "Craig : [Laughter]" got awkward from the get-go. It is phrased like it's a response currently. Very staccato and interrupting the flow of the article. I'd actually do the opposite and go more candid than professional, since "laughter" isn't quite informative. Perhaps something that looks like it's a side note, and less formal. So maybe; (Chris laughs) (Prompting another laugh from the interviewer) etc.
- type0 10y ago> (Chris laughs) (Prompting another laugh from the interviewer) etc. I think that's right, the same as in play writing.