3 ms·
You can define alpha/beta in terms of the covariance of the Kalman filter. See my book (linked above) for the derivation (I call it a g-h filter, some literatur
by RogerL 10y ago
You can define alpha/beta in terms of the covariance of the Kalman filter. See my book (linked above) for the derivation (I call it a g-h filter, some literature uses alpha-beta, some g-h, they are the same thing). Eli Brookner in "Tracking and Kalman Filters Made Easy" uses a different but mathematically equivalent derivation to show the relationship.
There are at least a couple dozen of commonly used filters that can be understood as form of the alpha-beta filter. Some use constants for g/h, some vary them over time. The Kalman filter varies them on each epoch based on the covariance of the state and measurements. There are other schemes. The KF is optimal in the least squares sense when the noise is Gaussian and and the system obeys the Markov property.
Another way to look at these is to derive them from Bayes' theorem. You can derive both the alpha-beta filter and Kalman filter from Bayes' theorem. It's all the same family, just with different assumptions/knowledge about your process and measurement noise.
- abstrakraft 10y agoI'd agree that the alpha-beta filter is a special case of the Kalman filter (which isn't what I'd call a subset, but maybe we're just arguing semantics). All the filters you mention are certainly related, but claiming that the alpha-beta filter is a Kalman filter is either naive or obstinate.