(Repost from previous thread) The first paragraph defends the Gawker media bully under the misunderstood "free speech" umbrella. What about the right to privac

(Repost from previous thread) The first paragraph defends the Gawker media bully under the misunderstood "free speech" umbrella. What about the right to privacy? Other than that, this is quite a poor article. There's nothing to learn from it or enjoy. The title is a clickbait to a non story. > That’s why I have no desire to sue Nick Denton. Hell, if I see him, I’ll buy him a drink. People shouldn't be forced to forgive evil. Maybe the author wouldn't be so chill if those same journalists exploited intimate details of his life for public mockery.