4 ms·
I see what your trying to say; and I do sympathise. Really there are two situations though (and I think youir mixing the two together and making a general state
by ErrantX 17y ago
I see what your trying to say; and I do sympathise. Really there are two situations though (and I think youir mixing the two together and making a general statement).
Firstly parents teaching a child about their own religious views. Now I personally think that the correct way to do this is to present those views and allow the child to make a choice; but I don't think I can turn round and tell a parent instilling their views on a child that what they are doing is wrong. They are trying to teach the child things they believe to be correct and are doing so in good faith and with love. I am hopeful that our society now is modern enough to give the child their own choice later in life.
On the other hand we have people teaching religion to children generally. For example here in the UK primary schools are supposed to have so many hours "worship" each week. I find that kind of thing just sickeningly horrible (partly because I consider organised religions pretty evil (or non-benign) entities). Unfortunately it doesn't worry most parents (who may not have beliefs - but just shrug their shoulders at the "brainwashing" and say it's not having an effect). Removal of choice is something I despise.
With all that said this is not really a topic worthy of a forum like this. :)
- rbanffy 17y ago> With all that said this is not really a topic worthy of a forum like this. :) Unless we find a way to hack religion to suit our purposes ;-)
- CrazedGeek 17y agoWe should start a Scientology clone. Idea: Call it Grahamism, get pg and jgrahamc to chip in, expand, and profit.