Can't you just say the decision was based on a random forest trained on the following parameters with historical data. You could get more specific on how the mo

Can't you just say the decision was based on a random forest trained on the following parameters with historical data. You could get more specific on how the model was trained or even show model if you have to. I'm sure you can create a small-print tree diagram. In terms of human review, does this require more than a spot check? I can imagine look over the p-value and possibly spot check the input data, and then approve it.