I'm willing to "pay" for content via ads, as long as those ads are not a vector for security violations. I just wrote to the NYT the other day, pointing out th

I'm willing to "pay" for content via ads, as long as those ads are not a vector for security violations. I just wrote to the NYT the other day, pointing out that I block ads, yet had just visited a site (linked from NYT) where I saw ads despite blocking and didn't mind. These were just content in the page, not ad network-served. If the only way a publisher can profit is to risk my security, then they have a problem, not me. (I also pay for NYT access, but I still block)