Sure. "Silly" is in the eye of the beholder, of course, and I do think successfully executing the "launch" of an exploit is probably a great career move. I sti

Sure. "Silly" is in the eye of the beholder, of course, and I do think successfully executing the "launch" of an exploit is probably a great career move. I still think it is silly. I'm less convinced the trend has any use for communicating seriousness. I don't expect product names (basically what this is) to meaningfully convey actionable information in any trustworthy way. But I'll reconsider next time I see a car named "Cheap, mostly-OK vehicle with probable future maintenance headaches" or an exploit named "Smasher of stacks of a little-known utility optionally installed alongside Enterprise Product X, so long as these 7 unlikely preconditions are met".