> It's not actually clear to me that she put national security at risk What contained in those emails is irrelevant. The very fact that she deliberately to ser

> It's not actually clear to me that she put national security at risk What contained in those emails is irrelevant. The very fact that she deliberately to serve own personal purposes violated all security protocols. That itself shows that the lady is unfit to be trusted with national security. Just the way police would arrest any guy with DUI whether or not he threatened someone else's safety. In California you would be arrested immediately if you are carrying your legal firearm in a car and if the case + barrel is not under a proper lock. Your intent, ignorance or whether you really put someone at risk would not matter.