9 ms·
I was only familiar with the original, and enjoyed finding out about these "better" and "best" variants. But I'll note: http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
by ploxiln 10y ago
I was only familiar with the original, and enjoyed finding out about these "better" and "best" variants. But I'll note:
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ is really quite good, and it's a single 4KB request
http://thebestmotherfuckingwebsite.co/ http://thebestmotherfuckingwebsite.co/ is 19 requests, 1.37MB, and the appearance and functionality are terrible
Yeah it's what everyone does these days, but it's everything I hate about the "modern" websites:
* it shows no content without scrolling
* full background photos with no relationship to the content
* gratuitous transitions and layout changes
with only the most tenuous relationship to the content
There's also a link to http://evenbettermotherfucking.website/ http://evenbettermotherfucking.website/ which cuts the contrast too far, but otherwise is fine, and only 5KB.
So really, the "best" variant is not "a bit further", it's a full hop/skip/jump into the deep-end of "modern" anti-patterns