3 ms·
In 2014 I bought a ~50$ Android while traveling Latin America. I didn't expect much more of the browsing experience than reading mostly text based articles. But
by smoe 10y ago
In 2014 I bought a ~50$ Android while traveling Latin America. I didn't expect much more of the browsing experience than reading mostly text based articles. But I didn't even get that. Literally half the linked articles I clicked on hacker news led to sites which where close to or impossible to navigate because of JS shenanigans and the assumption of an least a 4G internet connection.
It is especially annoying if one claims to target a world audience, but expects them to have a +500$ phones and vast data subscriptions.
- niftich 10y agoThe market fixes this, though. If your websites don't load on a low-end Android over 3G, you won't attract the sort of audience that uses that setup. Conversely, if you know what a large portion of your audience uses specs like that, you'll go through great lengths to ensure your sites are performant and usable. It seems that most 'western' sites have decided focus on people with desktops or +500$ phones and vast data subscriptions.
- voltagex_ 10y agoIn your example, most of the time the "market" won't fix that though, because there's no money to be made in servicing the users with "cheap" phones.
- swiley 10y agoSo it's really a Western web and not an open web. You've proven exactly what everyone on here is saying: there's so much focus on marketing and audiences that many users get completely shafted. That's sad to see given that the web is often heralded as something that gives under privileged people access, and the ability to share, to powerful and useful information.
- AndreyErmakov 10y agoIn some places, $500 is about a half-year salary from which one has to live and feed their family. Nobody in their right mind would waste it on an electronic toy.