5 ms·

This trend of extremely polarizing and provoking headlines is getting out of control. Reading this headline, I feel like if you're not doing remote work, then

This trend of extremely polarizing and provoking headlines is getting out of control. Reading this headline, I feel like if you're not doing remote work, then you're wrong. Aren't there shades of grey here? Is remote work the way for EVERYONE? I understand that people need to get clicks but this is a worrisome evolution.

simonhamp 10y ago
I think the key word here is 'embrace'. The article actually presents quite a balanced view
ericbhanson 10y ago
Agreed. It also completely glosses over the difficulties in managing collaboration across time zones. Yes, software tools make this a lot easier, but there is still the physical limitation of different members of a team working at different hours. And guess what? Some of those team members may end up working longer or later than they'd want to because they're farther away than everyone else.
- freddyc 10y ago
  This was my experience when I worked remotely for an East Coast company while based in SF. When I joined the company the expectation was that I would work Pacific hours, coming online around 9am PDT. Of course reality proved very different, and slowly my start time crept earlier and earlier until I found myself online at 6am daily - I was effectively working 3-4 hours longer than my East Coast colleagues simply because of the timezone I was located in. I didn't last long and moved to Bay Area company that allowed me to work from home 2-3 days a week.
- gryphonshafer 10y ago
  I've worked for companies as a remote worker, and I've owned a company that for its entire lifetime hired remote staff. In my experience, as long as you hire good people, the time zone delta is the only limitation that's extremely difficult if not impossible to overcome. Everything else can be solved with good communication (which should exist anyway), good requirements (which should exist anyway), and good process (which should exist anyway). If the time zone range of a team is less than about 4, then in my experience the team works quite well. If the range is greater than 5, it almost always encounters problems that even good process, requirements, and communication struggle to solve. There are always exceptions, of course.
forthefuture 10y ago
The worst part is that authors honestly believe a title like: "Why Remote Working is Good" can't get traffic.

simonhamp 10y ago

I think the key word here is 'embrace'. The article actually presents quite a balanced view

ericbhanson 10y ago

Agreed. It also completely glosses over the difficulties in managing collaboration across time zones. Yes, software tools make this a lot easier, but there is still the physical limitation of different members of a team working at different hours. And guess what? Some of those team members may end up working longer or later than they'd want to because they're farther away than everyone else.

freddyc 10y ago
This was my experience when I worked remotely for an East Coast company while based in SF. When I joined the company the expectation was that I would work Pacific hours, coming online around 9am PDT. Of course reality proved very different, and slowly my start time crept earlier and earlier until I found myself online at 6am daily - I was effectively working 3-4 hours longer than my East Coast colleagues simply because of the timezone I was located in. I didn't last long and moved to Bay Area company that allowed me to work from home 2-3 days a week.
gryphonshafer 10y ago
I've worked for companies as a remote worker, and I've owned a company that for its entire lifetime hired remote staff. In my experience, as long as you hire good people, the time zone delta is the only limitation that's extremely difficult if not impossible to overcome. Everything else can be solved with good communication (which should exist anyway), good requirements (which should exist anyway), and good process (which should exist anyway). If the time zone range of a team is less than about 4, then in my experience the team works quite well. If the range is greater than 5, it almost always encounters problems that even good process, requirements, and communication struggle to solve. There are always exceptions, of course.

forthefuture 10y ago

The worst part is that authors honestly believe a title like: "Why Remote Working is Good" can't get traffic.