3 ms·
I think by the fact that you are already looking for ways to disapprove the research (Which you say doesn't exist yet) your point gets lost. And given I'd say
by aaron695 10y ago
I think by the fact that you are already looking for ways to disapprove the research (Which you say doesn't exist yet) your point gets lost.
And given I'd say most people on HN take it as fact the the internet has caused concentration and contemplation issues you need evidence of the opposite.
With everyone believing something on anecdotal evidence it becomes up to the opposing view.
- scott_s 10y agoI disagree (obviously). It means that I have strong priors, in the Bayseian sense, because I have heard of poorly done studies that try to answer similar questions. I am also aware of what I consider to be a significant issue with replication in psychological studies (something which has been on HN frequently).